Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- Claude Opus 4AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 71/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Claude Opus 4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 80/100 | 2/100 | 47/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$15/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$75/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
85K
No usage
Completed sessions
995,265
No usage
Token share
0.06%
No usage
Tokens
698B+100%
No usage
AUG 28OCT 22
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.2%1.1K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeClaude Opus 4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Opus 4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Opus 4 vs Jamba MiniClaude Opus 4·Jamba Mini