Compare AI models: Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Claude Sonnet 4AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 62/100 | 11/100 | 47/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 64/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
200K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.00/ 1M
$0.17/ 1M
Output
$15/ 1M
$0.70/ 1M
Cached input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
3.2M
Completed sessions
1
82,043,256
Token share
0%
31.6%
Tokens
00%
357T+100%
No trend data
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
68.9%318K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Sonnet 4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 4 vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 4·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba Mini