Compare AI models: DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	89/100	37/100	0/100	0/100 — Tool calling not supported
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	56/100	82/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

131K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.06/ 1M

$0.30/ 1M

Output

$0.09/ 1M

$1.20/ 1M

Cached input

Unknown

$0.006/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

No usage

13K

Completed sessions

No usage

141,711

Token share

No usage

0.04%

Tokens

No usage

445B+100%

No trend data

AUG 28OCT 22

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.