Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax-M3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 56/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiniMax-M3 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 83/100 | 54/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 21/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.33/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
13K
211K
Completed sessions
141,711
1,674,470
Token share
0.04%
0.19%
Tokens
445B+100%
2.1T-61%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
63.7%13K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3·Jamba Mini