Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Step 5 Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 5 PreviewStepFunHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 56/100 | 100/100 | 53/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 5 Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 36/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.70/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
11K
112K
Completed sessions
107,624
2,627,574
Token share
0.03%
0.64%
Tokens
330B+100%
7.2T+100%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
77.1%933 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeStep 5 Preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 5 Preview·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonStep 5 Preview vs Jamba MiniStep 5 Preview·Jamba Mini