Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	53/100	82/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.6-Pro	44/100	100/100	57/100	93/100	67/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Audio, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.43/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.87/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.0036/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

11K

122K

Completed sessions

107,624

615,081

Token share

0.03%

0.22%

Tokens

330B+100%

2.5T+100%

AUG 28OCT 22

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

68.1%4.1K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.