Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-4.7ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GLM-4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 44/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.45/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.09/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.09/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.2M
0
Completed sessions
81,885,589
27
Token share
31.6%
0%
Tokens
356T+100%
00%
AUG 28OCT 22
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-4.7 vs Jamba MiniGLM-4.7·Jamba Mini