Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 56/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 34/100 | 84/100 | 64/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.2M
246K
Completed sessions
29,155,539
7,213,658
Token share
9.25%
0.39%
Tokens
104T-60%
4.4T+149%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.2%194K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba Mini