GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Gemini 4 Argon

  1. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsGoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Gemini 4 ArgonGoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder13/10093/10083/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Gemini 4 Argon50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10093/10083/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$12/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1
Completed sessions
No usage
21
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
12M+100%
No trend data
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.