Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 37/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$1.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
55K
129K
Completed sessions
537,491
1,147,263
Token share
0.04%
0.07%
Tokens
434B+120%
748B-62%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.6%772 user-weeks
66.3%7.7K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Plus vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Plus·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Plus vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Plus·Jamba Mini