Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Grok 4.7
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 37/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
56K
47K
Completed sessions
537,869
115,146
Token share
0.04%
0.01%
Tokens
434B+120%
60B+100%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.6%772 user-weeks
44.7%1.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini