Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 37/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 14/100 | 71/100 | 59/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
55K
88K
Completed sessions
537,491
361,914
Token share
0.04%
0.07%
Tokens
434B+120%
838B-63%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.6%772 user-weeks
63.6%4.3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Jamba Mini