Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Kimi K2.5
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K2.5MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 67/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Kimi K2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 20/100 | 44/100 | 64/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.45/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$2.25/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
917K
6.7K
Completed sessions
125,453,444
13,739
Token share
16.6%
0%
Tokens
187T+100%
2B-96%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
72.9%133 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K2.5 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.5·Jamba Mini