Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs beam
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- beamReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 67/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| beam | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$0.60/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
917K
110K
Completed sessions
125,453,444
2,794,067
Token share
16.6%
0.49%
Tokens
187T+100%
5.5T+100%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativebeam vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructbeam·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonbeam vs Jamba Minibeam·Jamba Mini