Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GLM-4.7
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-4.7ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 44/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.45/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$2.09/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.09/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
917K
0
Completed sessions
125,455,570
27
Token share
16.6%
0%
Tokens
187T+100%
00%
AUG 28OCT 22
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.4%10K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-4.7 vs Jamba MiniGLM-4.7·Jamba Mini