Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs GLM-5.1

Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Kimi K2.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	78/100	33/100	64/100	50/100	27/100
GLM-5.1	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	88/100	33/100	47/100	0/100	45/100

Overview

Author

Moonshot

Zhipu

Context length

262K

200K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Moonshot

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$0.74/ 1M

$0.90/ 1M

Output

$3.72/ 1M

$3.59/ 1M

Cached input

Unknown

$0.19/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

80K

43K

Completed sessions

241,113

100,931

Token share

0.01%

Tokens

145B-80%

72B-77%

AUG 28OCT 22

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

61.6%3.3K user-weeks

55.8%1.8K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6Jamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1Jamba Mini