Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.7
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 25/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
121K
47K
Completed sessions
524,277
115,146
Token share
0.02%
0.01%
Tokens
271B+31%
60B+100%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
45.9%6.2K user-weeks
44.7%1.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini