Compare AI models: jev-1.13 vs Grok 4.6

jev-1.13Hollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
jev-1.13	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Grok 4.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	39/100	25/100	75/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

xAI

Context length

Unknown

500K

Reasoning

Unknown

True

Input modalities

Unknown

Text, Image

Output modalities

Unknown

Text

Providers

xAI

Pricing

Input

Unknown

$2.00/ 1M

Output

Unknown

$6.00/ 1M

Cached input

Unknown

$0.50/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

37K

60K

Completed sessions

2,331,060

135,668

Token share

0.01%

Tokens

67B+100%

73B+1,052%

AUG 28OCT 22

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

41.3%3.3K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativejev-1.13 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructjev-1.13Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonjev-1.13 vs Jamba Minijev-1.13Jamba Mini Related comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6Jamba Mini